Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 04:11
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
China Rare-Earth Magnet Maker Gets Green Light for US Exports - Bloomberg
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
iOS 26 Adds Support for Transferring an eSIM to and From Android - MacRumors
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Was the EU formed to hurt the US as Trump claims?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ananda Lewis, Celebrated MTV VJ, Dead at 52 - Rolling Stone
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
For the First Time, Scientists Spot Water Around a Young Star Similar to Our Sun - The Daily Galaxy
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why are black people seen as scary or a threat to some people?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
What Really Killed The Neanderthals? A Space Physicist Has a Radical Idea - ScienceAlert
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why are the Chinese so sensitive to Western criticism?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.